Look familiar? (XLII)

18 responses to “Look familiar? (XLII)”

1. Brad Vickers says:

   July 1, 2016 at 10:09 pm

   Amazing you found this door xD keep up the good work!

   Reply
2. Cris Without H says:

   July 2, 2016 at 6:40 pm

   I can’t see the slideshow here. Is it glitched?

   Reply
   • albert says:

     July 3, 2016 at 12:11 pm

     Yes, it seems something is wrong, but I don’t know what happened :/ that’s why I post that HD image link aswell

     Reply
     • Cris Without H says:

       July 3, 2016 at 1:17 pm

       Ah, don’t worry, mate.
       On a side note, environment is incredibly important, but I’m super excited for characters/enemies textures. I do think it will be a challenge, due to RE4’s specific style.

       Reply
       • albert says:

         July 4, 2016 at 2:29 am

         I agree! I think the real challenge will come with the organic and bloody flesh textures

         Reply
         • Cris Without H says:

           July 4, 2016 at 5:25 am

           Ah, yes. Unless you’d be willing to watch snuff movies, which I doubt, finding actually flesh and blood sources will be difficult. I assume looking at anatomical pictures will have to do.

   • Cris says:

     July 4, 2016 at 10:42 pm

     I’ve corrected the slideshow glitch (not sure what the issue was – I simply re-uploaded the image for the slideshow).

     Reply
     • Cris Without H says:

       July 5, 2016 at 5:49 am

       Now that I can take a closer look at it… actually, what was remastered? I mean, I assumed it to be the door, but it still looks kinda low res.

       Reply
       • albert says:

         July 5, 2016 at 6:19 am

         These “Look familiar” posts are not progress updates. They are comparisons between original textures and their real-life counterpart.
         They are something like… “hey-I-found-the-original-thing-in-real-life” updates 😛

         Here’s a real comparison of the door frame:
         https://www.re4hd.com/wp-content/gallery/0098-back-to-the-village-2/21.jpg

         Reply
         • Cris Without H says:

           July 5, 2016 at 7:32 am

           Oh, I see ^^’

         • Cris Without H says:

           July 7, 2016 at 9:04 am

           Although, I must say, I think the model on that one shouldn’t be changed. It sorta goes away from the in-game design.

         • albert says:

           July 8, 2016 at 5:17 am

           Well… I don’t know what to say. I just edit the model in order to fix those modeling/mapping isues you can see in the original. No other design edits were applied. To my eyes, the original looked distorted and poorly mapped

         • Cris Without H says:

           July 9, 2016 at 6:11 pm

           It looks ordinary to me. I dunno, it just doesn’t seem like something that denies physics or logic.

3. Alvare says:

   July 7, 2016 at 5:18 pm

   I couldn’t disagree more with you Cris Wihout H.. kinda disappointed in you now. 😛

   Reply
   • Kaludio says:

     July 7, 2016 at 9:06 pm

     yep, i’m with Alvare, the new frame looks much better. The original model was probably left in that state cuz capcom development team said “fuck it, close enough” xD

     Reply
   • Cris Without H says:

     July 9, 2016 at 6:10 pm

     D: Senpai is disappointed in me!
     Seriously though, wasn’t the previous doorframe looking the way Capcom wanted? I know it looks different in real life, but… so what? I mean, it didn’t look like a glitch in the game, so shouldn’t it stay?

     Reply
     • Alvare says:

       July 10, 2016 at 5:00 am

       D’: haha. Had to check urban dictionary for that one.
       But seriously tho, you know about UV mapping, right? To check if a texture’s distorted or not is easily done by putting a checker pattern on it, you’ll notice the square’s are twisted and turned. Which basically means that the actual texture will be that distorted too. In that case, the geometry will NEVER, look plausible. Especially not up close or when viewed from certain angles. If you’re not persuaded by the screenshot I suggest you check out that area and see for yourself how ugly it is. 😛

       Reply
       • Cris Without H says:

         July 10, 2016 at 11:59 am

         Actually, I have no idea about all this technical terms o:

         Reply